KO 대한민국
채권형

Private Credit: How Supply/Demand Dynamics are Shaping the Landscape

2019년5월 - 6 분 읽기

Ian Fowler, Co-Head of the North American Private Finance Group, discusses the dynamics of each middle market segment—including upper-end style shift resulting from competitive pressures—and explains why the traditional middle is the sweet spot.

Can you start by defining the middle market for us?

The middle market in the U.S. represents over 200,000 companies that employ over 50 million Americans. As an investible asset class, S&P defines it as companies with less than $50 million of EBITDA, whereas Reuters calls it those with revenues or a loan facility size under $500 million. From a GDP perspective, the U.S. middle market would be the third largest economy in the world. So, as a whole, the middle market represents a significant growth engine for the U.S. economy. It also poses a particularly attractive opportunity for our clients, because these companies often cannot directly access liquid capital markets, and therefore they need private lending to raise capital for investments.

Can you describe the different segments of the middle market issuer universe? And where do you see the most value?

You can break it into three market sub-segments—the first being the lower end of the middle market, which we think of as companies with $15 million or less of EBITDA. This equates to a loan facility size of $5-25 million. The traditional middle market would be companies with EBITDA between $15 and $40 million, which would mean loan facilities of under $100 million in size. On the upper end, we’re talking about companies with EBITDA north of $40 million, probably up to about $75-100, with loan facilities over $100 million.

X

베어링자산운용은 당사 웹사이트 사용자들에게 최적화된 웹 경험을 제공하고자 쿠키를 사용합니다.
베어링 웹사이트를 이용함으로써, 당사의 쿠키정책법적 & 개인정보고지사항에 동의하는 것으로 간주합니다.