KO 대한민국

Are High Yield Investors Being Compensated for Risks?

2019년9월 - 3 분 읽기

In the context of today’s fundamental backdrop and default outlook, spread levels suggest investors are being fairly compensated, relative to other points in the cycle, for the amount of risk they are taking.

While the search for yield is nothing new, it has certainly intensified in recent months as low, and even negative-yielding debt continues to dominate the investment landscape. But for investors who may normally turn to higher-yielding assets, such as high yield bonds and loans, a number of potential concerns—slowing economic growth, the elongated credit cycle, and an increase in defaults—remain top of mind.

One big question, in particular, is around valuations—and whether spreads, at current levels, are compensating investors for the amount of default risk they’re assuming. The short answer, in our view, is yes—based on a few key considerations: 

  1. Market and issuer fundamentals 
  2. Supply/demand dynamics 
  3. Historical default and recovery rates 

Market & Issuer Health

Broadly speaking, high yield issuers appear to be more disciplined compared to the years preceding the global financial crisis. Looking at U.S. high yield bonds, for instance, the volume of leveraged buyouts—higher-risk deals that involve a significant amount of borrowed money—is lower today versus 2006/2007.1 In addition, CCC bond issuance has been somewhat muted relative to the years leading up to the financial crisis. Issuance of higher-risk payment-in-kind or deferred bonds has also been lower, accounting for less than 1% of total issuance in recent years.1

RECENT U.S. ISSUANCE TRENDS ARE HEALTHIER COMPARED TO 2006/2007Recent U.S. Insurance Trends are Healthier Compared to 2006/2007Source: J.P. Morgan. As of February 2019. Lower rated is defined as credits rated Split B, CCC or NR.

Driven by a reasonably strong economic backdrop over the past few years, corporate earnings have been solid and leverage levels largely stable. Additionally, due in part to lower financing costs over the last decade, interest coverage ratios appear relatively healthy.

As a result, defaults—the biggest potential risk for high yield investors—continue to hover around 3%, slightly below long-term historical averages.2 While an increase in defaults across more challenged sectors—energy and retail, namely—has contributed to a slight uptick in overall defaults this year, we do not expect to see a widespread or material increase in defaults in the near term.


From a technical standpoint, we believe the high yield market overall remains supported. Demand is steady, coming from both the re-investment of existing capital and new capital entering the asset class. Given the ongoing search for yield, we believe demand should remain healthy, and with the relatively muted forward calendar, the market should be well-supported going forward.

That said, economic cycles by nature have an end date, and we will eventually go through another recession. And while we don’t expect the next downturn to be as severe as the financial crisis—based on the generally more conservative financial profiles of high yield issuers today—we would certainly anticipate an increase in defaults through the next cycle.

Spreads in the Context of Defaults

While defaults do entail a potential loss of principal, there are typically opportunities to recover a portion of that through a restructuring process. Although past recovery rates do not indicate future results, factoring in long-term recovery assumptions for various high yield assets—from senior secured loans and bonds to unsecured bonds—can provide a general idea of what the implied default rate should be based on the current spread levels across various recovery assumptions.

For example: High yield bonds are currently offering spreads of roughly 400 basis points (bps) over the risk-free rate.3 If an investor assumes a recovery rate of 50% for high yield bonds—very close to the long-term average recovery rate for senior unsecured high yield bonds4—a spread of 400 bps would imply an 8% default rate in order to fully erase any excess spread that should be required over a risk-free opportunity. For context, the last time U.S. high yield bond defaults reached 8% was during the financial crisis. Even assuming a 30% recovery rate—significantly lower than the long-term average for senior unsecured high yield bonds—a spread of 400 bps would imply a 5%–6% default rate in order to fully erase excess spread, a rate not seen since 2008/2009. This scenario appears overly pessimistic given the current state of the economy and previously mentioned fundamental backdrop.

Of note, these assumptions do not fully capture potential trading volatility in the asset class during periods of economic weakness, but they do help frame the relative level of risk premium in the market for long-term, strategic investors. Every investor is different, and risk/reward thresholds can vary significantly. As such, while these assumptions are no guarantee of future results, they can enable investors to identify—based on their own assumptions and future expectations—whether current spread levels look attractive in light of the risks they expect to encounter going forward.

LOSS GIVEN DEFAULT SCENARIOSCHART TITLESource: Barings. Loss Given Default calculated as the default rate multiplied by one minus the recovery rate. For illustrative purposes only. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Poised to Capture Relative Value

In today’s uncertain environment, we think a bottom-up, credit-intensive approach is key. While we believe the markets look fairly stable from a fundamental standpoint, there are a number of potential risks—escalating trade tensions, ongoing Brexit negotiations, concerns around commodity pricing—that could impact high yield going forward. Concerns surrounding slowing global economic growth and the possibility of a recession also linger.

Rather than trying to time investment decisions around these factors, we see value in taking a rigorous, bottom-up approach to credit selection, aiming to choose credits that can withstand headwinds and hold up through cycles. An active approach can be particularly advantageous, as it can allow managers to move away from credits that exhibit fundamental weakness in favor of healthier issuers. If or when defaults do increase, investors can benefit from partnering with managers who have a long track record of handling these situations. As we mention in our recent podcast—Distressed Debt: How This Cycle May Be Different—managers with deep resources and an experienced team are very well-positioned, in our view, to manage high yield assets through market volatility and drive attractive risk-adjusted returns.

1. Source: J.P. Morgan. As of February 2019.
2. Source: Credit Suisse. As of August 30, 2019.
3. Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch. As of August 30, 2019.
4. Source: Moody’s Corporate Default & Recovery Rates. As of February 2019.

해당 자료에 제시된 전망은 작성 시 시장에 대한 베어링자산운용의 견해를 바탕으로 작성되었습니다. 작성된 이후, 다양한 요인에 따라 사전통지 없이 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 투자에는 위험이 수반됩니다. 투자와 투자에서 발생하는 향후 소득 가치는 하락 또는 상승할 수 있으며, 투자 수익은 보장되지 않습니다. 과거성과는 현재 또는 미래성과를 보장하지 않습니다. 

더 읽어보기

또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 실제 투자의 구성, 규모 및 위험은 본 자료에서 제시된 사례와 현저히 다를 수 있으며, 투자의 향후 수익 혹은 손실 여부에 대해 보증 및 보장하지 않습니다. 환율 변동은 투자가치에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 잠재 투자자들은 본 자료에 언급된 펀드의 자세한 내용과 구체적인 위험요인에 관하여 투자설명서를 반드시 읽어 보시기 바랍니다.
베어링은 전 세계 베어링 계열사의 자산운용 및 관련 사업의 상표명입니다. Barings LLC, Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited,Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, Baring Asset Management Korea Limited 등은 Barings LLC의 금융서비스 계열사로(단독으로는 “계열사”) “베어링”으로 통칭합니다.
본 자료는 정보 제공의 목적으로 작성된 것이며, 특정 상품이나 서비스의 매매를 제안하거나 권유하기 위한 것이 아닙니다. 본 자료의 내용은 독자의 투자목적, 재무상태 또는 구체적인 니즈를 고려하지 않고 작성되었습니다. 따라서, 본 자료는 투자자문, 권유, 리서치 또는 특정 증권, 상품, 투자, 투자전략 등의 적합성 또는 적절성에 대한 권고가 아니며 그러한 행위로 인식되어서도 안됩니다. 본 자료는 투자 전망 또는 예측으로 해석되어서는 안됩니다.
달리 명시되지 않는 한, 본 자료에 제시된 견해는 베어링의 것입니다. 작성 당시 알려진 사실을 바탕으로 신의 성실하게 작성 되었으며 사전통지 없이 변경될 수 있습니다. 개별 포트폴리오 운용팀은 본 자료에 제시된 것과 다른 견해를 가질 수 있으며 고객별로 다른 투자 결정을 내릴 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 일부 내용은 베어링이 신뢰할 만 하다고 판단하는 출처에서 획득한 정보를 근거로 작성되었습니다. 본 자료에 수록된 정보의 정확성을 확보하기 위해 최선의 노력을 기울였으나, 베어링은 정보의 정확성, 완전성 및 적절성을 명시적 또는 묵시적으로 보증하거나 보장하지 않습니다.
본 자료에 언급된 서비스, 증권, 투자 또는 상품은 잠재투자자에게 적합하지 않을 수 있으며 해당 관할권에서 제공되지 않을 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 저작권은 베어링에 있습니다. 본 자료에 제시된 정보는 개인용도로 사용될 수 있으나 베어링의 동의 없이 변형, 복제 또는 배포할 수 없습니다.



베어링자산운용은 당사 웹사이트 사용자들에게 최적화된 웹 경험을 제공하고자 쿠키를 사용합니다.
베어링 웹사이트를 이용함으로써, 당사의 쿠키정책법적 & 개인정보고지사항에 동의하는 것으로 간주합니다.