KO 대한민국
베어링 인베스트먼트 인스티튜트
거시경제 및 지정학

Why 2 Degrees Celsius May Beat 2 Percent CPI

2019년7월22일

Investors should watch closely as some financial regulators begin to take a more expansive view of their mandates and pay more attention to the planet's rising temperature.

Noted American Economist and Nobel Prize Winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that climate change is a crisis that warrants the kind of policy response that was last employed during World War II. The policy cost should be viewed as irrelevant when compared to the consequences of inaction. Extreme climate domino effects could lead to water scarcity crises and threats to food production systems – events that could potentially tip nations in some hard-hit regions into military conflict.

Under such extreme scenarios, the traditional central banker’s focus on a 2% CPI forecast might become meaningless. The 2 degrees Celsius target - the threshold an increase in the average global temperature is believed to yield catastrophic results if crossed - might become a target that overwhelms all others.

Some might argue that the long-run consequences of climate change may occur beyond the usual policy forecast horizon for central banks. However, the San Francisco Fed indicated that central banks already consider long-term factors such as demographic change when formulating policy. They argue that climate change is becoming relevant for a range of macroeconomic issues, including potential output growth, capital formation, productivity, and the long-run level of the real interest rate. 

The same paper identifies climate change as one of the three key macro forces that will shape the U.S. economy in the 21st century (along with demographics and technological innovation). The authors describe how climate change will have direct effects on the economy via adaptation spending to accommodate rising temperatures including more air conditioning, better flood defense spending and more resilient infrastructure. In addition, they highlight transition risks associated with the adjustment to a low-carbon economy as fossil fuel assets risk including the possibility of large fossil fuel assets becoming stranded as demand for oil and gas declines.

The San Francisco Fed paper argues that climate change is relevant for the formulation of the Federal Reserve’s monetary and regulatory policy by highlighting the risk of loan losses for banks that result from business interruptions and bankruptcies caused by extreme weather events. Financial institutions should conduct “climate stress tests” to assess their solvency across a range of future scenarios instituted by environmental and ecological change, the paper concludes. 

The Bank of England has gone further, suggesting that stress tests should provide a framework against which banks and insurance companies can be challenged to explain how they are managing environmental risk. Financial firms will also need to respond to these stress tests and detail emergency response planning. Senior bank staff have cautioned that, although wider policy should be set by government, cleaning up after a climate-related emergency will undoubtedly involve the Bank of England.

Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank Benoit Coeure in a speech late last year highlighted the ways climate-related risks could affect the economy through elevated credit spreads, increased precautionary saving, and even a future financial crisis. He questioned who will be held responsible for paying for the consequences of extreme weather, such as agricultural losses, the effect of commodity price spikes, flood damage, etc. If the carbon emitter is going to pay, how does one calculate the charge when the impact has an infinite horizon? 

Moreover, consider that the largest emitters (to date) have been developed economies. Yet many coastal cities that are most vulnerable to sea level increases are in the emerging world. How should emitters compensate those who are impacted in other nations? 

It has been only four years since Bank of England Governor Mark Carney made his landmark speech on climate change and was subsequently accused of mission creep. Things have moved quickly. There were 21 speeches by Central Bank officials that covered the topic in the 12 months leading up to March 2019. All but two of those were by members of the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), a central bank club launched in late 2017 as a “coalition of the willing” after a G20 sustainable finance group faltered under U.S. government antipathy. The NGFS launched with eight founding members; it now has 36 members and 6 observers.

Do existing central bank mandates incorporate a climate change goal? Research from the University of London has examined the directives of over 100 Central Banks and found that 16 explicitly mentioned a sustainability target. However, an additional 38 central banks were found to have mandates which described a requirement to support national policy. The University of London’s team argues that where governments have signed the Paris Agreement (and 189 nations have done so) the local central bank has a de facto mandate to support policies that address climate change. 

Just how central banks will ultimately incorporate concerns about climate change into their mandates remains to be seen.  But investors in general, and the financial services industry in particular, should watch closely as some financial regulators begin to take a more expansive view of their mandates and pay more attention to the planet's rising temperature. 

해당 자료에 제시된 전망은 작성 시 시장에 대한 베어링자산운용의 견해를 바탕으로 작성되었습니다. 작성된 이후, 다양한 요인에 따라 사전통지 없이 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 투자에는 위험이 수반됩니다. 투자와 투자에서 발생하는 향후 소득 가치는 하락 또는 상승할 수 있으며, 투자 수익은 보장되지 않습니다. 과거성과는 현재 또는 미래성과를 보장하지 않습니다. 

더 읽어보기

또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 실제 투자의 구성, 규모 및 위험은 본 자료에서 제시된 사례와 현저히 다를 수 있으며, 투자의 향후 수익 혹은 손실 여부에 대해 보증 및 보장하지 않습니다. 환율 변동은 투자가치에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 잠재 투자자들은 본 자료에 언급된 펀드의 자세한 내용과 구체적인 위험요인에 관하여 투자설명서를 반드시 읽어 보시기 바랍니다.
베어링은 전 세계 베어링 계열사의 자산운용 및 관련 사업의 상표명입니다. Barings LLC, Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited, Barings Real Estate Advisers Europe Finance LLP, BREAE AIFM LLP, Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, Baring Asset Management Korea Limited 등은 Barings LLC의 금융서비스 계열사로(단독으로는 “계열사”) “베어링”으로 통칭합니다.
본 자료는 정보 제공의 목적으로 작성된 것이며, 특정 상품이나 서비스의 매매를 제안하거나 권유하기 위한 것이 아닙니다. 본 자료의 내용은 독자의 투자목적, 재무상태 또는 구체적인 니즈를 고려하지 않고 작성되었습니다. 따라서, 본 자료는 투자자문, 권유, 리서치 또는 특정 증권, 상품, 투자, 투자전략 등의 적합성 또는 적절성에 대한 권고가 아니며 그러한 행위로 인식되어서도 안됩니다. 본 자료는 투자 전망 또는 예측으로 해석되어서는 안됩니다.
달리 명시되지 않는 한, 본 자료에 제시된 견해는 베어링의 것입니다. 작성 당시 알려진 사실을 바탕으로 신의 성실하게 작성 되었으며 사전통지 없이 변경될 수 있습니다. 개별 포트폴리오 운용팀은 본 자료에 제시된 것과 다른 견해를 가질 수 있으며 고객별로 다른 투자 결정을 내릴 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 일부 내용은 베어링이 신뢰할 만 하다고 판단하는 출처에서 획득한 정보를 근거로 작성되었습니다. 본 자료에 수록된 정보의 정확성을 확보하기 위해 최선의 노력을 기울였으나, 베어링은 정보의 정확성, 완전성 및 적절성을 명시적 또는 묵시적으로 보증하거나 보장하지 않습니다.
본 자료에 언급된 서비스, 증권, 투자 또는 상품은 잠재투자자에게 적합하지 않을 수 있으며 해당 관할권에서 제공되지 않을 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 저작권은 베어링에 있습니다. 본 자료에 제시된 정보는 개인용도로 사용될 수 있으나 베어링의 동의 없이 변형, 복제 또는 배포할 수 없습니다.

19-903699

X

베어링자산운용은 당사 웹사이트 사용자들에게 최적화된 웹 경험을 제공하고자 쿠키를 사용합니다.
베어링 웹사이트를 이용함으로써, 당사의 쿠키정책법적 & 개인정보고지사항에 동의하는 것으로 간주합니다.