KO 대한민국
베어링 인베스트먼트 인스티튜트
거시경제 및 지정학

The Trade War’s Winners

2019년9월20일 - 3 분 읽기

It’s not discussed in polite company, but there are always winners.

JAKARTA⁠—They all “tut-tut” with the same regretful tone about the mounting friction between the United States and China. The trade experts who bemoan tariffs and sanctions explain how these new costs of commerce will squelch global prosperity. Then they lean forward, with a sigh, and intone solemnly: “You know, there are no winners.”

But it’s not strictly true as business executives in the traffic-clogged Indonesian capital will tell you. Beyond the individual companies that may benefit from a tariff slapped on a competitor, there are large categories of investments whose business model can work around⁠—or under or through⁠—any tariffs or restrictions that may arise. 

The latest rounds of scheduled trade talks between Washington and Beijing suggest another glimmer of hope for agreement, but investors should just turn off their trade news alerts. Any deal that comes now will likely be limited in scope, and any tariffs that are delayed or removed can reappear just as easily. (A savvy few will also be thinking ahead to the United States’ election next year, and it’s unlikely the president wants to defend a weak China deal just as his Democratic challengers gear up.)

Meanwhile, consider these categories of likely beneficiaries. 

Southeast Asia: The economies on China’s southern rim represent a massive “de-militarized zone” as trade tensions mount. Many firms were already shifting production here as Chinese labor costs rose, but the trade friction has triggered an acceleration of some of those plans. Production facilities here can sell into both the U.S. and China with less fear of getting stuck in the crossfire. 

Indonesian executives readily admit that, even though complex labor laws and venal bureaucrats have hindered investment, their economy still seems to be benefitting. It’s wrong to draw too many conclusions from short-term trends in Foreign Direct Investment, but there do seem to be a number of important winners in this neighborhood even as flows into the United States and China have stalled. 



Multinationals: If your business model involves low-cost production in China to sell to high-wage consumers in the United States, you will be particularly vulnerable in this brave new tariff world. If, however, you make some of everything to sell almost everywhere, you have an enormous advantage when walls go up. 

Clothing or furniture production in China, for example, can simply be sold on Chinese markets if U.S. tariffs make them too expensive to ship across the Pacific. Parts or inputs that may face tariffs in one jurisdiction can usually be sourced elsewhere if a firm has diverse international facilities. There will be glitches and adjustments along the way, but beam and ballast offer stability when the waters start to roil.

“Beyond the individual companies that may benefit from a tariff slapped on a competitor, there are large categories of investments whose business model can work around – or under or through – any tariffs or restrictions that may arise.”

Digital Services: There are also firms whose products effectively move like phantoms through tariff walls. Even as the volume of trade growth has slowed in recent years, cross-border digital flows have exploded. To be sure, these include a lot of cute cat videos, but a growing share represent important services, analyses and even the remote operation of industrial installations. 

Cumbersome Chinese regulations sometimes require localization of data storage. New European privacy rules have imposed restrictions on the handling of personal information, but these activities have yet to get caught up in tariff escalation. 



“Trans-Pacific Partnership”: Other winners include countries that went ahead to sign what was rebranded as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership that President Trump renounced during his first month in office. These 11 economies, including Japan, Australia, Canada and Mexico, decided they would benefit from the deal even if it did not include better access to U.S. markets.

This means, for example, that Canadian and Australian farmers have better access to the lucrative Japanese market than their American competition. So far, the Trump Administration’s talks with Tokyo don’t seem to include much on agriculture. Meanwhile, trade among these countries has been mainly free from U.S.-Chinese tensions. Indeed, China has actually lowered tariff levels with key trading partners even as it has raised retaliatory levies against U.S. imports. 

Financial Services: Even as negotiations unraveled over the summer, Chinese authorities pressed ahead with new measures to open up to foreign competition. The rules allow international credit rating agencies to evaluate Chinese bonds and brokerages to act as lead underwriters for new issues. Foreign firms also got broader access in asset management, pension management and currency brokerage. Restrictions on foreign insurance firms were loosened too.

Just how much the new rules draw in fresh foreign investment remains uncertain, but they are a notable step opposite the current, more restrictive trends. A courageous few will surely benefit.

Of course, the sour experts are surely right that trade wars are bad for the economy and the world, but there are still some clear beneficiaries. Global commerce is not necessarily a zero-sum game where there is a winner for every loser, but investing is still a relative pursuit where some will do better even as others do worse.

해당 자료에 제시된 전망은 작성 시 시장에 대한 베어링자산운용의 견해를 바탕으로 작성되었습니다. 작성된 이후, 다양한 요인에 따라 사전통지 없이 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 투자에는 위험이 수반됩니다. 투자와 투자에서 발생하는 향후 소득 가치는 하락 또는 상승할 수 있으며, 투자 수익은 보장되지 않습니다. 과거성과는 현재 또는 미래성과를 보장하지 않습니다. 

더 읽어보기

또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 실제 투자의 구성, 규모 및 위험은 본 자료에서 제시된 사례와 현저히 다를 수 있으며, 투자의 향후 수익 혹은 손실 여부에 대해 보증 및 보장하지 않습니다. 환율 변동은 투자가치에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 잠재 투자자들은 본 자료에 언급된 펀드의 자세한 내용과 구체적인 위험요인에 관하여 투자설명서를 반드시 읽어 보시기 바랍니다.
베어링은 전 세계 베어링 계열사의 자산운용 및 관련 사업의 상표명입니다. Barings LLC, Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited,Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, Baring Asset Management Korea Limited 등은 Barings LLC의 금융서비스 계열사로(단독으로는 “계열사”) “베어링”으로 통칭합니다.
본 자료는 정보 제공의 목적으로 작성된 것이며, 특정 상품이나 서비스의 매매를 제안하거나 권유하기 위한 것이 아닙니다. 본 자료의 내용은 독자의 투자목적, 재무상태 또는 구체적인 니즈를 고려하지 않고 작성되었습니다. 따라서, 본 자료는 투자자문, 권유, 리서치 또는 특정 증권, 상품, 투자, 투자전략 등의 적합성 또는 적절성에 대한 권고가 아니며 그러한 행위로 인식되어서도 안됩니다. 본 자료는 투자 전망 또는 예측으로 해석되어서는 안됩니다.
달리 명시되지 않는 한, 본 자료에 제시된 견해는 베어링의 것입니다. 작성 당시 알려진 사실을 바탕으로 신의 성실하게 작성 되었으며 사전통지 없이 변경될 수 있습니다. 개별 포트폴리오 운용팀은 본 자료에 제시된 것과 다른 견해를 가질 수 있으며 고객별로 다른 투자 결정을 내릴 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 일부 내용은 베어링이 신뢰할 만 하다고 판단하는 출처에서 획득한 정보를 근거로 작성되었습니다. 본 자료에 수록된 정보의 정확성을 확보하기 위해 최선의 노력을 기울였으나, 베어링은 정보의 정확성, 완전성 및 적절성을 명시적 또는 묵시적으로 보증하거나 보장하지 않습니다.
본 자료에 언급된 서비스, 증권, 투자 또는 상품은 잠재투자자에게 적합하지 않을 수 있으며 해당 관할권에서 제공되지 않을 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 저작권은 베어링에 있습니다. 본 자료에 제시된 정보는 개인용도로 사용될 수 있으나 베어링의 동의 없이 변형, 복제 또는 배포할 수 없습니다.



베어링자산운용은 당사 웹사이트 사용자들에게 최적화된 웹 경험을 제공하고자 쿠키를 사용합니다.
베어링 웹사이트를 이용함으로써, 당사의 쿠키정책법적 & 개인정보고지사항에 동의하는 것으로 간주합니다.