KO 대한민국
베어링 인베스트먼트 인스티튜트
거시경제 및 지정학

Investor’s Guide to the Second-Most Important Economic Challenge

2020년11월13일 - 3 분 읽기

After the pandemic recovery, the U.S.-China relationship will move into ever-more complicated and uncharted territory.

With America’s elections (mostly) over and vaccine news boosting recovery hopes, investors will soon return their focus to the world’s next-most important economic challenge: the increasingly fraught relationship between the United States and China. The next few months offer further risks around new pandemic outbreaks, fresh lockdown restrictions and a slow roll-out of medical breakthroughs, but soon enough markets will be firmly focused on the next chapter of Washington vs. Beijing. 

Markets may not miss Donald Trump’s unpredictable tweets, but the next headlines around TikTok or tariffs will reflect deeper trends that set the bilateral relationship on a much more complex and unpredictable course. Outright war is far from inevitable, but the drama will shape the world’s supply chains, technological innovation and financial flows. And the drama will play out on at least five interconnected levels.
 

  1. The Leaders: Media accounts, and therefore market sentiment, often focus on the personal chemistry between the leaders: Nixon and Mao, Reagan and Deng, Trump and Xi. President-elect Joe Biden can charm just about anyone he wants to, and he likes to tell the stories about how he has spent more time with Xi than any other American leader when they were both vice presidents and road buddies during extended visits to each other’s countries. If global differences could be patched up over dinner and a movie, then we’d be all set.
  2. The Bureaucracies: Alas, no matter how much two presidents get along, each country engages more concretely through its cabinet ministers, ambassadors and broader bureaucracies, which immediately introduce complications. Biden has yet to make his key international and economic appointments, but his new team will be greeted first by Chinese counterparts who likely feel battered and bewildered by four tumultuous years of negotiating with the Trump administration. Trump’s tariffs spurred China into talks, but both sides sent confusing signals the other interpreted as bad faith, according to a riveting account by two Wall Street Journal reporters. Meanwhile, China has fallen well behind in its promises to make large agricultural and manufacturing purchases under the deal.
  3. The Economics: The officials will start talking again, of course, and they may even find a way through their mutual suspicions in time. Much harder, however, will be landing on a next agreement that each side can take home to a domestic political audience that has grown much more suspicious of the other. While America was losing industrial jobs long before China’s admission to the World Trade Organization in 2001, the narrative of China abusing its access to international markets has taken root across the U.S. political spectrum, including among large firms that have grown frustrated with Chinese business practices. But the trade imbalances are rooted in far more than one-sided protectionism. “Trade Wars Are Class Wars” is how Michael Pettis and Matthew C. Klein explain the structural economic friction. China’s leaders, they argue, imposed a system that suppressed domestic wages and consumption, creating a dependence on foreign (and especially American) demand for their products. Meanwhile, trade surpluses in China (and Europe) have undercut American manufacturing and aggravated inequality and populist sentiment. Untangling these forces is not the work of a single administration.
  4. The Geopolitics: If these economic forces don’t look complicated enough, they are intensified still further by the great historical drama of a rising power challenging a dominant one. Harvard’s Graham Allison makes this case as he reviews similar moments back to the struggle between entrenched Sparta and upstart Athens. The dynamic does not lead to inevitable war, he points out, but it can. Careful management on both sides is crucial, which means framing negotiations around market access or intellectual property protection as problems in and of themselves, rather than skirmishes in a greater race for global dominance. 
  5. The Ideologies: The Chinese Communist Party is not out to re-litigate the Cold War that the Soviet Union lost on behalf of Marxism-Leninism. “The CCP actually functions as the Chinese Civilization Party,” in the words of Singaporean diplomat and scholar Kishore Mahbubani. It aims to return China’s greatness to “the oldest civilization on the planet.” Meanwhile, America, he argues, “operates from the assumption of virtue,” which often blinds it to the China’s legitimate grievances.

“President-elect Joe Biden can charm just about anyone he wants to, and he likes to tell the stories about how he has spent more time with Xi than any other American leader when they were both vice presidents and road buddies during extended visits to each other’s countries. If global differences could be patched up over dinner and a movie, then we’d be all set.”

This leaves investors to contemplate the coming headlines across all of these levels. The new Biden administration will likely be more methodical, with the next president eager to re-establish his relationship with Xi. His team will also quickly engage their counterparts on trade and technology and climate policy, but the broader structural and political differences will re-emerge soon enough. The tone may be more predictable, but the rising risks of misunderstanding may make the next chapters far more difficult.

해당 자료에 제시된 전망은 작성 시 시장에 대한 베어링자산운용의 견해를 바탕으로 작성되었습니다. 작성된 이후, 다양한 요인에 따라 사전통지 없이 내용이 변경될 수 있습니다. 또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 투자에는 위험이 수반됩니다. 투자와 투자에서 발생하는 향후 소득 가치는 하락 또는 상승할 수 있으며, 투자 수익은 보장되지 않습니다. 과거성과는 현재 또는 미래성과를 보장하지 않습니다. 

더 읽어보기

또한 본 자료에서 언급된 투자 결과, 포트폴리오 구성 및 사례는 단순 참고용이며, 결코 미래 투자 성과 혹은 미래 포트폴리오 구성을 보장하지 않습니다. 실제 투자의 구성, 규모 및 위험은 본 자료에서 제시된 사례와 현저히 다를 수 있으며, 투자의 향후 수익 혹은 손실 여부에 대해 보증 및 보장하지 않습니다. 환율 변동은 투자가치에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 잠재 투자자들은 본 자료에 언급된 펀드의 자세한 내용과 구체적인 위험요인에 관하여 투자설명서를 반드시 읽어 보시기 바랍니다.
베어링은 전 세계 베어링 계열사의 자산운용 및 관련 사업의 상표명입니다. Barings LLC, Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited,Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, Baring Asset Management Korea Limited 등은 Barings LLC의 금융서비스 계열사로(단독으로는 “계열사”) “베어링”으로 통칭합니다.
본 자료는 정보 제공의 목적으로 작성된 것이며, 특정 상품이나 서비스의 매매를 제안하거나 권유하기 위한 것이 아닙니다. 본 자료의 내용은 독자의 투자목적, 재무상태 또는 구체적인 니즈를 고려하지 않고 작성되었습니다. 따라서, 본 자료는 투자자문, 권유, 리서치 또는 특정 증권, 상품, 투자, 투자전략 등의 적합성 또는 적절성에 대한 권고가 아니며 그러한 행위로 인식되어서도 안됩니다. 본 자료는 투자 전망 또는 예측으로 해석되어서는 안됩니다.
달리 명시되지 않는 한, 본 자료에 제시된 견해는 베어링의 것입니다. 작성 당시 알려진 사실을 바탕으로 신의 성실하게 작성 되었으며 사전통지 없이 변경될 수 있습니다. 개별 포트폴리오 운용팀은 본 자료에 제시된 것과 다른 견해를 가질 수 있으며 고객별로 다른 투자 결정을 내릴 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 일부 내용은 베어링이 신뢰할 만 하다고 판단하는 출처에서 획득한 정보를 근거로 작성되었습니다. 본 자료에 수록된 정보의 정확성을 확보하기 위해 최선의 노력을 기울였으나, 베어링은 정보의 정확성, 완전성 및 적절성을 명시적 또는 묵시적으로 보증하거나 보장하지 않습니다.
본 자료에 언급된 서비스, 증권, 투자 또는 상품은 잠재투자자에게 적합하지 않을 수 있으며 해당 관할권에서 제공되지 않을 수 있습니다. 본 자료의 저작권은 베어링에 있습니다. 본 자료에 제시된 정보는 개인용도로 사용될 수 있으나 베어링의 동의 없이 변형, 복제 또는 배포할 수 없습니다.

20-1412346

X

베어링자산운용은 당사 웹사이트 사용자들에게 최적화된 웹 경험을 제공하고자 쿠키를 사용합니다.
베어링 웹사이트를 이용함으로써, 당사의 쿠키정책법적 & 개인정보고지사항에 동의하는 것으로 간주합니다.