Public Fixed Income

From Rising Rates to Rising Stars: What’s Ahead for IG Credit?

April 2021 – 4 min read
Rising rates can bring challenges to IG corporate credit, but opportunities are emerging as well—particularly given the supportive fundamental and technical backdrop.

Rising U.S. Treasury yields have certainly brought rates to the forefront of investors’ minds. At a high level, rising rates can be challenging for investment grade (IG) corporate credit given the longer-duration of the asset class, and can lead to negative total returns—and indeed, IG corporate bonds returned -4.65% in the first quarter of the year. However, while negative total returns have historically driven retail flows out of IG bond funds, that phenomenon has yet to materialize, with the asset class experiencing inflows in all but two weeks of the quarter. In addition, despite the volatility in Treasury yields, corporate spreads remained stable, finishing the quarter at 91 basis points (bps), close to where they started the year (96 bps) (Figure 1).1
 

FIGURE 1: IG SPREADS REMAINED STABLE IN THE FIRST QUARTER

Source: Barings. As of March 31, 2021.
 

Supportive Technicals & Strong Fundamentals

Part of the reason for the stability in spreads is that IG corporates remain well-supported by a strong fundamental and technical backdrop. Outside of hard-hit sectors like airlines and hotels, corporate fundamentals have been relatively resilient over the last year and should benefit as the economy continues to improve going forward. Corporate leverage, while elevated, has remained lower than expected, with a significant portion sitting as cash on company balance sheets. Going forward, one big question is around how companies will deploy this capital. If they use it to pay down debt, leverage may return to more normal levels. We may be more likely to see this among lower-rated BBB companies, in particular, given their higher likelihood of being downgraded to high yield. Single-A companies, on the other hand, may have more room to add leverage and/or pursue growth opportunities.  

From a technical standpoint, following last year’s record $2.1 trillion of new issuance, expectations were for a return to more normal levels in 2021. However, issuance surged early in the year—reaching $442.1 billion by the end of March—as a number of companies rushed to the market to try and get ahead of rates potentially rising even further.2 While this resulted in some deterioration in technicals mid-quarter, the supply/demand dynamic has since begun to normalize, for a few reasons. For one, the U.S. Federal Reserve signaled that it would keep interest rates low for some time, which should in turn normalize the pace of issuance.

In addition, institutional demand for U.S. corporate credit has strengthened, particularly from foreign investors in Asia and Europe, given that hedging costs have improved meaningfully—as well as the fact that there is still a significant amount of low or negative-yielding debt around the world. Indeed, for the asset class’ institutional buyer base in particular, rising rates are not all bad. Last year, with both rates and corporate yields near all-time lows, some institutional investors faced challenges in terms of asset-liability matching, leading them to consider allocations to lower-rated, higher-yielding asset classes. As rates have moved higher this year, the resulting incremental yield has rectified this challenge to an extent, leading to a push back into the asset class.
 

Areas of Opportunity

While it’s hard to argue that spreads will move much tighter from here, the supportive backdrop and continued economic growth should benefit corporate credit going forward, and we expect to see select opportunities in the coming months. One interesting trend is around rising stars, or companies upgraded from high yield to investment grade. Last year, $238 billion was downgraded from investment grade, and this year, we believe many of these companies could just as quickly make a round trip back to IG—in fact, it looks like we may see more upgrades than downgrades on a net basis. This is partly because ratings agencies are giving companies more time to work through the post-pandemic environment. There is also an incentive for companies to either remain in, or get upgraded to, the IG space—namely, the more favorable cost of capital relative to high yield, as well as the access to the capital markets. 

Within this universe of potential upgrades, energy stands out from a sector standpoint. Last year, energy companies were hit particularly hard from both COVID and the precipitous drop in oil prices. Natural gas prices were also low, and a number of companies were downgraded as a result. Today, oil prices are sitting around $60 a barrel and natural gas is around $2.50, which is supportive of cash flows. In addition, we have seen greater discipline across the industry, with many companies taking material steps to lower leverage. These factors have already resulted in upgrades this year—natural gas company Cenovus is one example—and in our view could lead to further upgrades going forward. 

Looking ahead, given the positive growth outlook for the global economy and the accommodative policy stance from the Fed, IG corporates are likely to remain supported. That said, a number of uncertainties remain on the horizon—from the vaccine rollout to the potential for rates to rise further. In this environment, there may be benefits to looking beyond traditional corporate bonds, particularly in securitized products like collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and asset backed securities (ABS). ABS, for instance, can offer diversification benefits as part of a broader investment grade allocation due to the diverse scope of the space. CLOs, too, can offer a number of benefits alongside traditional corporate bonds, particularly given their floating rate nature and strong structural protections. However, a credit-by-credit approach rooted in rigorous, fundamental analysis remains paramount to uncovering opportunities across the IG landscape, as well as to avoiding companies that may face greater challenges going forward.
 

1. Source: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Index. As of March 31, 2021.
2. Source: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Index. As of March 31, 2021.

Stephen Ehrenberg

CFA, Managing Director

Charles Sanford

Head of Investment Grade Credit

Any forecasts in this material are based upon Barings opinion of the market at the date of preparation and are subject to change without notice, dependent upon many factors. Any prediction, projection or forecast is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance. Investment involves risk. The value of any investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed by Barings or any other person. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Any investment results, portfolio compositions and or examples set forth in this material are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of any future investment results, future portfolio composition or investments. The composition, size of, and risks associated with an investment may differ substantially from any examples set forth in this material No representation is made that an investment will be profitable or will not incur losses. Where appropriate, changes in the currency exchange rates may affect the value of investments. Prospective investors should read the offering documents, if applicable, for the details and specific risk factors of any Fund/Strategy discussed in this material.

Barings is the brand name for the worldwide asset management and associated businesses of Barings LLC and its global affiliates. Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited, Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, and Baring Asset Management Korea Limited each are affiliated financial service companies owned by Barings LLC (each, individually, an “Affiliate”).

NO OFFER: The material is for informational purposes only and is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or service in any jurisdiction. The material herein was prepared without any consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of anyone who may receive it. This material is not, and must not be treated as, investment advice, an investment recommendation, investment research, or a recommendation about the suitability or appropriateness of any security, commodity, investment, or particular investment strategy, and must not be construed as a projection or prediction.

Unless otherwise mentioned, the views contained in this material are those of Barings. These views are made in good faith in relation to the facts known at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views than the views expressed herein and may make different investment decisions for different clients. Parts of this material may be based on information received from sources we believe to be reliable. Although every effort is taken to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate, Barings makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information.

Any service, security, investment or product outlined in this material may not be suitable for a prospective investor or available in their jurisdiction. Copyright in this material is owned by Barings. Information in this material may be used for your own personal use, but may not be altered, reproduced or distributed without Barings’ consent.

Related Viewpoints