Macroeconomic & Geopolitical

The Future of Money May Come Sooner Than You Think

March 2021 – 3 min read
The pandemic delivered a boost to cashless commerce, but fresh designs for digital money will disrupt far more than coins and bills.

A century ago, the U.S. government established the Palo Seco Leper Colony on a 500-acre fruit farm near Panama City, complete with a plaza, a chapel and its own currency. As in many other countries, Canal Zone authorities believed separate coinage would avoid the spread of what is now called Hansen’s Disease and discourage any thoughts of escape. Pathogens and payments have a long, intertwined history. 

As markets take the measure of fresh inflationary pressures in the cyclical recovery, the current pandemic has sped the secular shifts to digital payments amid concerns that coins and bills might transport the virus and lockdown measures that encouraged online commerce. But it has also accelerated a far bigger shift in the way governments and people think about money, presenting enormous potential opportunities for businesses and even larger potential headaches for policymakers. 

Of all the ways the “new normal” may be different from the “old,” this may be near the top of the list.

Coins, of course, were revolutionary themselves as they moved commerce beyond simple barter. China gets credit for the first paper bills in the 7th century to ease large transactions, and America counted as many as 8,000 cities, banks and even churches that issued currency on the eve of the Civil War. Government involvement since then introduced greater security and reliability, but also more rules over who could spend money on what.

“Of all the ways the ‘new normal’ may be different from the ‘old,’ this may be near the top of the list.”

These days, the cheap digital storage, mobile networks and powerful data algorithms offer the prospect of turning currency and bank deposits into digitized tokens that both store and move value without the encumbrance and cost of account settlement. Three kinds of digital currency get most of the attention.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies draw headlines for their wild swings in value and foundational premise that governments are not to be trusted. The idea is that exotically named but strictly limited issuance will hold value far better than the dollars, yen and euros that governments print with reckless abandon. Meanwhile, the distributed ledgers that track and enable transactions ensure complete anonymity.

“Stablecoins” are a type of cryptocurrency but differ from others in that they rely on the backing of actual government currencies or gold rather than a common conviction. The Diem Project, formerly known as Libra, has drawn most of the attention thanks to its founding sponsor, Facebook. These stress the advantages of secure, inexpensive payments and broader access to financial services. 

As always, governments have been slow to the party, but they are catching up fast with “central bank digital currencies” (CBDCs or see-bee-dee-sees to the cognoscenti). These are designed to have all the familiarity and trust of the current lineup of “fiat” currencies but also the convenience and cost advantages the crypto versions. 

In part, governments don’t want to lose control of a world that is shifting away from physical cash. But digital currencies are touted for their potential to bring the poor and unbanked into the financial system without, for example, the crushing expense of payday lenders. They also offer the possibility of enormous efficiencies for all financial intermediaries—and just about anyone else who handles money.

“The cheap digital storage, mobile networks and powerful data algorithms offer the prospect of turning currency and bank deposits into digitized tokens that both store and move value without the encumbrance and cost of account settlement.”

China is famously first out of the gate with an “e-yuan” that will flow through an economy already substantially cashless but reliant on two private payment systems, Alipay and WeChat Pay. The government has already been priming the pump over the Lunar New Year holiday by distributing some “free samples” in a lottery that will serve as a field test for a larger launch before the Beijing Winter Olympics next year. There is also a political agenda that will allow better monitoring of internal financial flows and, in time, help establish an international alternative to dollars that can’t be blocked by Washington’s sanctions.

At the other end of the size/control/weather spectrum is the Central Bank of the Bahamas, which must contend with providing money across 700 hurricane-vulnerable islands to some 400,000 people, including many without bank accounts. The digital “Sand Dollar” can make payments when bank networks are disrupted and offer different levels of privacy, depending on the size of the transaction.

Globally, there are a dizzying array of experiments underway, as tracked by OMFIF’s Digital Monetary Institute, with different approaches to the knotty questions ahead. How best can these technologies balance the need for governments to monitor criminal and terrorist activity with a rising desire in many countries to protect personal privacy? What is the best way to blend the stability and trust that come from government sponsorship with a private innovation that will allow more convenient and less expensive ways of moving money?

The operational challenges are even harder. If individuals hold their money in accounts at their central bank, then how will commercial banks gather deposits to lend against? If digital currencies are distributed through banks, how will monetary policy transmission change? Can digital currencies pay interest directly to the holder? Can they charge interest if rates turn negative? 

The acceleration of these efforts through the pandemic means that global investors can’t avoid these questions any longer. The roles of financial intermediaries are about to be significantly disrupted if commerce and investment shift to incorporate more digital currencies. Meanwhile, the very understanding of safe havens looks set to change as markets eventually judge the e-yuan against the digital dollar that the U.S. Federal Reserve has begun to consider. This could lead to a significant reshaping of global payments and reserve holdings if the world’s favorite safe asset doesn’t quite measure up to the new alternatives.

Any forecasts in this material are based upon Barings opinion of the market at the date of preparation and are subject to change without notice, dependent upon many factors. Any prediction, projection or forecast is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance. Investment involves risk. The value of any investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed by Barings or any other person. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Any investment results, portfolio compositions and or examples set forth in this material are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of any future investment results, future portfolio composition or investments. The composition, size of, and risks associated with an investment may differ substantially from any examples set forth in this material No representation is made that an investment will be profitable or will not incur losses. Where appropriate, changes in the currency exchange rates may affect the value of investments. Prospective investors should read the offering documents, if applicable, for the details and specific risk factors of any Fund/Strategy discussed in this material.

Barings is the brand name for the worldwide asset management and associated businesses of Barings LLC and its global affiliates. Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited, Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, and Baring Asset Management Korea Limited each are affiliated financial service companies owned by Barings LLC (each, individually, an “Affiliate”).

NO OFFER: The material is for informational purposes only and is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or service in any jurisdiction. The material herein was prepared without any consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of anyone who may receive it. This material is not, and must not be treated as, investment advice, an investment recommendation, investment research, or a recommendation about the suitability or appropriateness of any security, commodity, investment, or particular investment strategy, and must not be construed as a projection or prediction.

Unless otherwise mentioned, the views contained in this material are those of Barings. These views are made in good faith in relation to the facts known at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views than the views expressed herein and may make different investment decisions for different clients. Parts of this material may be based on information received from sources we believe to be reliable. Although every effort is taken to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate, Barings makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information.

Any service, security, investment or product outlined in this material may not be suitable for a prospective investor or available in their jurisdiction. Copyright in this material is owned by Barings. Information in this material may be used for your own personal use, but may not be altered, reproduced or distributed without Barings’ consent.