Public Equities

ESG in Asia: Accelerating Momentum

May 2021 – 4 min read
The ESG regulatory landscape in Asia is quickly evolving, making sustainable practices an increasingly integral factor in investment decisions. As a result, Asian companies with better or improving ESG disclosures look well-positioned going forward.

Asia’s regulatory landscape continues to progress in terms of environmental, social and governance (ESG) adoption. China’s commitment to the Paris Agreement has perhaps been most emblematic of the growing momentum, with the country pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reach carbon neutrality by 2060. But many other countries—and by extension, companies—in the region are also making significant strides, driven not only by regulations but also investors’ increasing focus on ESG and its potential to impact investment performance over time. 

Broadly speaking, this momentum should result in higher-quality ESG data across Asia in the coming years, which in turn will better highlight the risks and opportunities that are present across the region’s equity markets. While many companies look very well-positioned to adapt to these changes going forward, not all companies will prosper—and careful, bottom-up analysis will be key to differentiating.

Making Good Progress

Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand are making steady progress when it comes to ESG, either by setting mandatory disclosure requirements or providing incentives for companies to do so. Hong Kong, for instance, has a clear framework in place for ESG guidelines, which requires companies to follow a “comply or explain” approach—if a company does not meet disclosure requirements, it is required to provide an explanation. The responsibility to disclose also lies with the company’s board, which, in our view, is an effective way to drive better ESG behavior. In Singapore, companies are asked to comply with local guidelines introduced by the Singapore Exchange in 2016, or explain why they do not. 

Meanwhile in Thailand, regulators have taken a unique approach to ESG. The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) created a Thailand Sustainability Investment (THIS) list in 2015, which includes companies that meet a designated threshold across 19 ESG parameters. This list not only highlights the companies that are making progress and embracing better business practices, but also, and in doing so, makes the companies suitable for inclusion in global portfolios which invest in sustainable companies. This list has acted as a clear motivator for companies to improve disclosures, growing from 51 stocks in 2015 to 124 in 2020.1

These regulations have created an advantage for those companies that are able to adapt to Asia’s ESG agenda, while they have presented challenges for those that are less able to adapt their business models. In particular, companies that are facilitating more sustainable practices across their industry look well-positioned going forward. Hong Kong insurer AIA Group is one example. The company currently publishes a detailed ESG report and, as part of its sustainable investment philosophy, has been reducing its investments in carbon intensive sectors since 2017. Another example is the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which recently launched a green finance framework with the aim of making sustainable financing more affordable for environmentally-aligned companies.


Picking Up the Pace

There are also countries, such as India and China, that, while not as advanced in their ESG policies, are making impressive strides today. In India, for example, disclosure requirements exist but in most cases are voluntary. Of note, however, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) recently approved draft guidelines that will require the top 1,000 companies by market capitalization to disclose their ESG initiatives. At the same time, businesses in the country are becoming increasingly aware of how better ESG behavior can have positive benefits. We have seen this in companies like India-based Reliance Industries, which is actively trying to diversify and reduce its mix of high carbon intensive refining and petrochemical business by investing aggressively into more green businesses like digital and retail. China, meanwhile, does not have a unified set of ESG regulations in place as of yet. However, this could change as soon as this year as the China Security Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is in the process of finalizing a comprehensive list of ESG standards. While governance has been the primary focus of regulations’ thus far, China’s aforementioned carbon neutral target will also likely add momentum to the environmental component. 

As regulations in some of these countries continue to ramp up in the years to come, we expect to see particular opportunities in companies that are taking concrete steps to improve their ESG practices, or in those that directly contribute to the region’s sustainable agenda—such as by offering products or services to help improve the environment or reduce carbon emissions. For example, companies that manufacture electric vehicle batteries—an industry that has been one of the primary beneficiaries of the push toward green investment globally—may be poised for growth going forward. Asian firms CATL and LG Chem are at the fore of this fast-growing, but highly concentrated sector.

Laying the Foundation

There are also a handful of countries that, while in the earlier stages of ESG adoption today, are on the right track, with regulations set to take effect in the coming years. Taiwan is one example. While ESG disclosures today are voluntary, starting in 2022 companies will be required to follow the Global Reporting Initiative standards on ESG reporting, which aim to help companies report on their sustainability in a consistent way. This suggests that the quality of disclosures in Taiwan could improve notably going forward. South Korea is in a similar position, with large listed companies required to disclose ESG data from 2025. However, ESG practices of a number of large South Korean corporations are already ahead of what local standards prescribe. 

Given these upcoming regulations, companies that are already in compliance, or close to being in compliance, look well-positioned for growth. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is an example. The company’s governance structure, resource management and supply chain initiatives, in particular, not only meet but in some cases are ahead of both Taiwanese regulations and its global technology peers. South Korean online platform Naver is another example of a company going beyond local market regulations. It scores particularly well on governance parameters as the majority of its board is independent, and it has separate Chairman and CEO roles. In fact, we believe that these strong ESG practices, combined with the company’s solid fundamentals, are part of the reason Naver’s valuation trades at a premium.


Key Takeaway

The accelerating momentum of ESG in Asia will likely reshape the equity investment landscape for years to come, giving way to attractive opportunities across the region’s equity markets. As countries continue to adopt and improve regulations, and ESG becomes a more permanent fixture, some companies will inevitably be better positioned than others. In our view, it takes careful, bottom-up stock selection to identify those set to benefit from this transition—and also to avoid those companies that may see a bigger threat to their business model. At Barings, ESG is integrated into every step of our investment process, as we believe it allows us to better assess the risks and opportunities that may not be apparent in traditional fundamental analysis. We also engage with company management teams to improve sustainability related disclosure and advocate for better practices, further contributing to Asia’s accelerating ESG momentum.

1. Source: Stock Exchange of Thailand. As of December 2020.

Marios Halloumis, CFA, FRM, CESGA

ESG Investment Integration Director – Public Assets, Sustainability & ESG

Kuldeep Khanapurkar, CFA

Investment Manager

Any forecasts in this material are based upon Barings opinion of the market at the date of preparation and are subject to change without notice, dependent upon many factors. Any prediction, projection or forecast is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance. Investment involves risk. The value of any investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed by Barings or any other person. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Any investment results, portfolio compositions and or examples set forth in this material are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of any future investment results, future portfolio composition or investments. The composition, size of, and risks associated with an investment may differ substantially from any examples set forth in this material No representation is made that an investment will be profitable or will not incur losses. Where appropriate, changes in the currency exchange rates may affect the value of investments. Prospective investors should read the offering documents, if applicable, for the details and specific risk factors of any Fund/Strategy discussed in this material.

Barings is the brand name for the worldwide asset management and associated businesses of Barings LLC and its global affiliates. Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited, Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, and Baring Asset Management Korea Limited each are affiliated financial service companies owned by Barings LLC (each, individually, an “Affiliate”).

NO OFFER: The material is for informational purposes only and is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or service in any jurisdiction. The material herein was prepared without any consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of anyone who may receive it. This material is not, and must not be treated as, investment advice, an investment recommendation, investment research, or a recommendation about the suitability or appropriateness of any security, commodity, investment, or particular investment strategy, and must not be construed as a projection or prediction.

Unless otherwise mentioned, the views contained in this material are those of Barings. These views are made in good faith in relation to the facts known at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views than the views expressed herein and may make different investment decisions for different clients. Parts of this material may be based on information received from sources we believe to be reliable. Although every effort is taken to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate, Barings makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information.

Any service, security, investment or product outlined in this material may not be suitable for a prospective investor or available in their jurisdiction. Copyright in this material is owned by Barings. Information in this material may be used for your own personal use, but may not be altered, reproduced or distributed without Barings’ consent.

Related Viewpoints