Macroeconomic & Geopolitical

Trump, Sanders or “Bloomiden”

February 2020 – 3 min read
It's as stark a choice as we have had in a long time, but the macroeconomic outcomes may not be so different.

Financial markets have turned nasty, an epidemic has us all on edge and we are staring at a crucial vote in a raucous Democratic primary. But even before we get results from Super Tuesday, it's already clear that the next president will be one of three people: Trump, Sanders or “Bloomiden.” 

While each represents dramatically different political philosophies—let alone personal styles—their consequences on the near-term outlook for the U.S. economy may be less than meets the eye. In fact, whatever the outcome, investors looking to 2021 can expect a further boost from fiscal policy and possibly an even more dovish Fed.

It may sound heretical in such a polarized campaign to suggest this election will carry less than apocalyptic consequences for the future of the United States and the Free World. Some of the speeches and slogans may, indeed, spook markets in the summer and fall, but it’s hard to see how any outcome will alter the current path of economic growth on its own.

“How can you possibly say that?” I hear you cry. “Even your so-called moderate is pushing a massive increase in taxes and regulation that will tank the market!” That may be true, especially if there are other headwinds from Japanese deflation, U.K.-EU trade talks or the coronavirus. But it’s not automatic.

Take a closer look at our composite centrist Democrat: Mike Bloomberg, with the bottomless pockets and Joe Biden, whose flagging campaign may still recover on the strength of his longstanding political network. With Pete Buttigieg now out of the race, Senator “Klowarren” might have a statistical chance, but it’s dwindling fast.


Source: Bloomberg. As of February 28, 2020.

The leading moderates all agree on raising corporate taxes, capital gains taxes and the highest personal tax bracket. (Indeed, in a measure of how far the debate has shifted, their tax proposals are all significantly higher than Hillary Clinton proposed.) They also favor spending a lot of money on infrastructure, health care, education and climate change. Deficit worries are barely mentioned.

If Democrats also take the Senate, the “Bloomiden” taxes will hurt corporate earnings and new regulations will target energy and drug companies. Still, fiscal policy overall will only grow more supportive and the economy should hum along nicely barring other potholes.

The betting markets don’t think Bernie Sanders can beat Trump, but the current polls show him leading in key battleground states. If it’s a strain to imagine what his strident campaign agenda might actually deliver in office, it’s now important to try.

Strip away the politically-charged “socialist” label, which means much less than it seems. His breathtaking spending proposals add up, by his own math, to roughly $40 trillion over the next decade, which he mostly pays for in a variety of new or higher taxes on profits, wealth and income. His proposals on labor rights, climate and housing alone suggest a large tangle of new rules that will chill corporate investment.

But in the real world, his website’s wish list will be watered down significantly even if Democrats control both houses of Congress. Those plans that are actually passed will take time to implement in their most rudimentary form. What looks very likely to happen quickly, however, under a Sanders Administration is that new taxes will be more than offset by a large boost of domestic spending. The policy uncertainty may hurt confidence, but fresh money in the pockets of people who really spend it will cushion the blow.

As for Trump, conventional wisdom has it that markets currently back him on the expectation that his second term will deliver still more tax cuts and de-regulation. This seems to gloss over the likely return of the president’s vigorous trade agenda and fresh tariffs, but that may be easier to ignore when compared to uncertainty around what the Democrats propose.

Fresh corporate tax cuts may be difficult unless Republicans take back the House. Still, fiscal policy will hardly be more restrictive in a second Trump term. Moreover, we all know what the president thinks of Jay Powell, and there will be a chance to name an even more dovish Fed chair just a year into his second term.


Source: Factset. As of February 28, 2020. 

The stark fact remains that any president’s economic policies are only tangentially related to actual economic outcomes in the near term. Not only do they take time to execute, but they are often overwhelmed by a recession in China or an oil price spike. While President Trump has credited his tax cuts with the strong economy, the reality is that economic growth and job creation in his first three years has not differed much from the pattern during the last three years of his predecessor.

So listen to the candidates, weigh their messages, but don’t automatically believe that any one of them will fundamentally change the near-term course of the economy. They all point to a mildly reflationary path of fiscal and monetary support. Given everything else going on in the world, that may not be too bad.

Christopher Smart, PhD, CFA

Chief Global Strategist & Head of the Barings Investment Institute

Any forecasts in this material are based upon Barings opinion of the market at the date of preparation and are subject to change without notice, dependent upon many factors. Any prediction, projection or forecast is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance. Investment involves risk. The value of any investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed by Barings or any other person. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Any investment results, portfolio compositions and or examples set forth in this material are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of any future investment results, future portfolio composition or investments. The composition, size of, and risks associated with an investment may differ substantially from any examples set forth in this material No representation is made that an investment will be profitable or will not incur losses. Where appropriate, changes in the currency exchange rates may affect the value of investments. Prospective investors should read the offering documents, if applicable, for the details and specific risk factors of any Fund/Strategy discussed in this material.

Barings is the brand name for the worldwide asset management and associated businesses of Barings LLC and its global affiliates. Barings Securities LLC, Barings (U.K.) Limited, Barings Global Advisers Limited, Barings Australia Pty Ltd, Barings Japan Limited, Baring Asset Management Limited, Baring International Investment Limited, Baring Fund Managers Limited, Baring International Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited, Baring SICE (Taiwan) Limited, Baring Asset Management Switzerland Sarl, and Baring Asset Management Korea Limited each are affiliated financial service companies owned by Barings LLC (each, individually, an “Affiliate”).

NO OFFER: The material is for informational purposes only and is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or service in any jurisdiction. The material herein was prepared without any consideration of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of anyone who may receive it. This material is not, and must not be treated as, investment advice, an investment recommendation, investment research, or a recommendation about the suitability or appropriateness of any security, commodity, investment, or particular investment strategy, and must not be construed as a projection or prediction.

Unless otherwise mentioned, the views contained in this material are those of Barings. These views are made in good faith in relation to the facts known at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views than the views expressed herein and may make different investment decisions for different clients. Parts of this material may be based on information received from sources we believe to be reliable. Although every effort is taken to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate, Barings makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information.

Any service, security, investment or product outlined in this material may not be suitable for a prospective investor or available in their jurisdiction. Copyright in this material is owned by Barings. Information in this material may be used for your own personal use, but may not be altered, reproduced or distributed without Barings’ consent.